On March 6, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a motion to compel the production of documents arising from defendants’ internal compliance investigations. 

See United States ex rel. Barko v. Halliburton Company, No. 05-cv-1276 (D.D.C. Mar. 6, 2014).

  The court rejected defendants’ arguments that these documents qualified for attorney-client privilege or work product protections, relying on the fact that the investigation was required by both government contracting regulations and internal corporate policy.


This communication, which we believe may be of interest to our clients and friends of the firm, is for general information only. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented and should not be relied upon as legal advice. This may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Please refer to the firm's privacy notice for further details.